Just a thought

Earlier today this picture appeared on the Facebook page of the Israeli Embassy in Ireland. It is an image of the Sacred and Immaculate Heart, with the festive caption, “A thought for Christmas…If Jesus and mother Mary were alive today, they would, as Jews without security, probably end up being lynched in Bethlehem by hostile Palestinians. Just a thought…”

Image

My initial reaction was, “Smooth move, directing this picture and caption at a country where the population is a.) predominantly Catholic and b.) generally sympathetic to Palestine. PR skillz, u no have any.” Then I thought of something else.

This image of the Holy Hearts is hanging on the wall of my host family’s house in Bethlehem (only ours is kitschier and better). When I saw the embassy’s Christmas message, I thought of the family’s experiences during the Intifada, when the house was constantly being requisitioned by Israeli troops. They used to corral everyone into one corner, and my landlady was never allowed to be the one to wake her children: the soldiers pulled them out of bed at gunpoint. When the soldiers got thirsty my landlady used to give them water. Occasionally some of them became distressed and she and her husband would try to comfort them. There were times when the curfew lasted so long that the family ran out of food. Soldiers would bring their own meals into the house (sometimes hot pizza, with its appetising smell) and the kids just had to sit there and try to bear the hunger until such time as curfew was lifted and they could go to the shop.

Last year I ended up bringing an Israeli friend who was then performing his own military service into the house. (He was off-duty at the time, obviously, and before you ask – it’s a long story. I may tell it some day.) I was worried about how the family would react to him. Sure enough, my landlady wasn’t best pleased – but not because he was an Israeli Jew and a soldier to boot, but because, “If the army find out he has been here they can hurt him. You need to look after your friends, Vicky, he is a good boy.” She sat in the living room and talked with him, underneath the Holy Hearts image and the equally kitschy representation of the Last Supper.

That picture on the wall of one Bethlehem family home has witnessed a lot of things, but never hate of the sort that was exhibited by the embassy this afternoon. Just a thought.

‘Resistance: which way the future?’

The main entrance to the arts centre was bedecked with bands of white plastic tape, with ‘Peace Week’ printed on each strip in blue letters. It reminded me immediately of the tape used to cordon off crime scenes while police gather forensic evidence. The organisers of the week were playing on that image deliberately: Peace Week was established in response to violent street crime in inner city Manchester. Now it is in its tenth year.

Police-style incident tape bearing the words 'Peace Week'.

The arts centre was hosting a film installation by Liz Crow, Resistance: Which Way the Future?. I don’t know if the centre deliberately arranged to feature this artwork during Peace Week. It may just have been a coincidence – but coincidental or not, the installation has something tough and dark and powerful to say about non-violence.

Entering the room, you sit down before the first of three screens. The film coughs into life with the sound of an engine. The first image: an exhaust trailing smoke, the underbelly of the bus. You watch for a long time. At first you are expectant. Then the wait starts to grate on you. What’s happening? What are you waiting for? With a sudden roar, the bus drives off, revealing a young nurse with a clipboard standing outside a creeper-covered country house. She makes a decisive mark on her clipboard, then walks briskly into the house.

Continue reading

Wrong on the Internet

The Internet is a terrific invention. Without it, I would never have found myself living on top of a pizza shop in Newcastle with my close friend Danni and a wheezy arthritic old cat, having to wear heavy-duty earplugs to block out the cheerful karaoke coming from the pub next door. (‘Mr Blue Sky’ and ‘I Am the One and Only’ were popular numbers, sung very loudly and with Geordie accents.) Without the Internet, I would never have found myself being force-fed vast quantities of dubious makloubeh by a Palestinian girl from Gaza in a kitchen in northern England. I would never have made the acquaintance of Shai (who has been quite invaluable in helping me with colloquial Hebrew – now I can even ask for a drug dealer and a wide selection of other things that I am unlikely to want). Without the Internet, I doubt that I would ever have smuggled an off-duty Israeli soldier into Bethlehem and sent him home wearing a kuffiyeh. (That story has yet to be told on this blog – I’ll get to it.)

Danni and I met on a forum for disabled teenagers, which was my intro to the power of the Internet in bringing about change for the better. That forum gave me some of my best friends. It provided advice for teenagers who were struggling to cope with their condition. It even saved a few lives (literally). When Britain’s coalition government began to draft in an unjust and dangerous series of welfare reform policies, disabled and chronically ill people took to the Internet to launch a counter campaign. Many of the participants couldn’t leave their houses – some even struggled to get out of bed – but they turned to their keyboards. I was particularly moved by people’s response to Ali, a severely ill woman who shared on her personal blog that suicide would be her only choice if her benefits were revoked. She had lived on the streets once, she wrote, and she would never go back there again. Within hours, a group of disabled people had conceived of ’5 Quid for Life’. Donors contribute five pounds per month to the organisation, and the money will be distributed to people facing Ali’s trouble.

For something that has accomplished so much good in my life, the Internet is also a terrible headache. I read and comment on a variety of blogs – about Palestine/Israel, about disability, about feminism, special needs education, mental health, ecology, veganism, theology, and so on. Sometimes the comment threads dissolve into a cesspool of petty spite. The topic of discussion is abandoned in favour of having the last word or taking another commenter down a peg or two. When the topic of discussion is a family who has lost their home or a prisoner who is dying, this absence of compassion is inexcusable, and I find myself asking why I am joining in with these conversations. What does it achieve?

Continue reading

Non-violence in a nutshell

As I wrote in the aftermath of Mustafa al-Tamimi’s murder, many Palestinians have become jaded with the concept of pacifist resistance, as it is often conflated with passivity. Acquiescing to the State of Israel’s insistence on retaining all of Jerusalem is needed to demonstrate ‘openness’; abandoning the boycott, divestment, and sanctions campaign is a sign of being ‘reasonable’; renouncing the one-state solution and accepting Israel’s right to exist as an ethno-religious state reveals a willingness to be ‘tolerant’. Without these things, Palestinians are told, you cannot be truly non-violent; and non-violence is your duty. We demand it of you. You won’t deserve even a sliver of the cake until you are on your best behaviour.

The devouring lion: graffiti near Bethlehem checkpoint

The devouring lion: graffiti near Bethlehem checkpoint

These things are not true. An unwavering commitment to justice ought to lie at the heart of all pacifist resistance. In surrendering their most basic rights in order to try and buy that crumbling slice of cake, Palestinians would become accessories to the state-sponsored violence that is being waged against their communities – the carving up of the West Bank into impoverished cantonments, the water shortages, the ongoing isolation of Gaza, the home demolitions,  the destruction of hundreds of years of Palestinian culture in Jerusalem and beyond. This meek acceptance of the status quo is not non-violence; you can’t have true non-violence without self-respect.

Continue reading

Pacifism or passivity?

This morning, in Tel Aviv’s Beilinson Hospital, twenty-eight-year-old Mustafa al-Tamimi died from the injuries he sustained at yesterday’s protest in the village of Nabi Saleh. A soldier opened the door of the military jeep as it was driving off and fired a tear gas canister at Mustafa at point-blank range. It struck him full in the face. When I saw the photograph, I was reminded of a red pomegranate split open on rock. His features were barely discernible.

This evening, IDF spokesperson Avital Leibovitch issued photographic justification of Mustafa’s killing, captioning it, “This is what he was doing.” The photo shows a cosy-looking bed. Looking at this piece of incontrovertible evidence, I could only conclude that Mustafa had been threatening soldiers’ lives with a 10.5 tog fibre quilt in a floral-patterned pastel cover. Then I registered the slingshot lying on top of the quilt. Avital Leibovitch’s insinuation is that Mustafa had been throwing stones.

Several people who were present at the demonstration have responded to her claim by pointing to the photo that was captured moments before the canister was fired. Mustafa has no slingshot, and he is carrying no rocks. In one sense, it was right to point this out – but in another it is wrong. It misses the point.

Continue reading

Life is good again: a poem for Palestine

This is the first poem I’ve written in four or five years. (I am more of a prosy sort of person really.) Originally I titled it ‘Defiance’, and then ‘Directions’, before finally settling on ‘Life is Good Again’. It was written to be recited rather than read, and to recreate the texture and depth that is lost outside performance I’ve added some photographs in illustration.

Life is Good Again

You’ll find me in the hills of south Hebron
hands reaching up to heaven
screaming justice for my children.

You’ll find these hands caked in earth
planting seeds, clearing rock,
and spreading on the earth
fire that you can’t fight –
a skimpy enough living, but bringing to birth
hope that you can’t halt.

You’ll find me in that line
waiting hours at a time
in heat and in cold, in rain
and in blistering shine.
I’m holding my ID, those papers that you gave me
the ones that have governed my movement since I was a baby
since the only free journey that I’ve ever made –
from her womb to this land.

Here I stand.

I’m standing on the open mountain
eyes welling up like salty fountains
each breath burning rough and jagged
as my breathing tears the air.

You call me a terrorist because
I will not keep silence
because inhaling is an act of violence
because today I will not get out of your way
because I am still standing –
although my home is not.

You’ll find me in the refugee camps
sewing by the light of broken lamps,
stitching out my story.
Meaning in every stitch, a message from a village
that exists only in my memory
and in my hands as I sew
letting you know
that these fingers don’t forget:
not our recipes, nor our jokes
not our harvest, nor our hopes.

Cramming chemistry in class
blowing vases of Hebron glass
making the best makloubeh you’ve ever had
dancing at a wedding
figuring out how to wash the bedding
when we’ve had no water all summer –
this is our resistance, our persistence,
our ordinary living.

In the camps and in the kitchen,
in Lebanon and London,
at protests and in prison –
you’ll find me in all these places,
staring at your faces,
noting that fear,
that shiver,
and wishing you only knew:

life is good again
when you find me in the mirror.

No.

I came online to the horrible news that there have been attacks along Israel’s southern border. Details are sketchy at the moment. At first I read that five Israeli soldiers had died as they travelled on an Egged bus, then I read that they were critically injured, then I read that they were dead, then injured, and so on. At first there were reports of three gunmen firing on the bus from the Egyptian side of the border. Then came reports of explosions in Beersheva. And then came a hailstorm of responses on Twitter, mostly from Israeli and international supporters of the Palestinian cause.

They were targeting armed soldiers, so it’s not terrorism.

Getting on a bus with civilians when you’re in military uniform is like using the civilians as human shields.

Israel does far worse…

This is resistance.

I know that Israel does worse. I know that hardly a day goes by without F16s and drones being heard in the Gazan sky. In Bethlehem my throat used to go tight whenever I heard fighters screaming southward overhead, because I guessed where they were going. I know that only a fraction of what happens to Palestinians in the Occupied Territories is widely reported; I’ve seen the crimes, and I’ve heard the silence afterward. I know that there is a terrible double standard in the portrayal of attacks on Palestinian civilians by the Israeli military and attacks on Israeli civilians by Palestinian militants. Operation Cast Lead made that clear enough.

But why is the cheapness at which Palestinian life is held by the Israeli military a reason to hold Israeli civilian life equally cheap? Resistance is worth nothing when you become the mirror image of your oppressor. Integrity is one of the few things that can’t be robbed from you at the point of a gun, and in responding to the death of a human being with, “But they do worse,” you relinquish that integrity and damage yourself more than you know.

To begin with, it’s not about ‘them’. It’s about an individual who has been killed or hurt. One person. I can’t look at any Israeli (civilian or soldier) and see them as just a representative of their state. I refuse. After talking to many IDF soldiers, I know that army life itself is often painfully effective in reducing people to mere symbols. As one soldier said to me and Rousol in Hebron, “I’ve got my political views, but as soon as I put on this uniform, I have to forget about them.” Another of them, who couldn’t have been more than eighteen or nineteen, responded to our question on how she felt about life in Hebron with, “What I feel doesn’t matter.” Her voice was so low and thin and sad. And a third soldier: “My opinion doesn’t count.”

I am not joining in with that. No matter what they do, no matter whether they choose it happily or they’re forced into it against their will, I refuse to see them as occupation’s symbols. I can’t be anything but unhappy when they die or get hurt. Oppression hurts the oppressors too. And  a supporter of the Palestinian resistance, I resist oppression wherever I find it.

Through the influence of my Palestinian colleagues, who are among the most loving and courageous people I’ve ever had the privilege to meet, I stopped caring whether a person is civilian or combatant long ago. Firstly, even the worst criminal has the capability to change and become good. Often the most peaceful and loving people are those who fought against their hatred and their anger – and won. Secondly, no matter who we are or what we do in life, we all bleed the same.

So I am not going to enter into any debates over whether this was justified. Whether it was terrorism or armed conflict. (‘Killing’ covers both of them nicely.) I don’t want to hear that Israel commits worse atrocities – I know it does, and I don’t want any part in anything that resembles those atrocities, even if it’s pale in comparison. If it’s wrong when they do it, it’s wrong when anybody does it. Instead of debating, I am going to spend my time praying: for the dead (the deaths of those five people were confirmed as I wrote this), for the wounded, for their families, and for the unfortunate souls in Gaza who are going to be pounded with a bloody vengeance tonight, because Ehud Barak has announced that Gaza is responsible and Gaza will pay.

I know what that means, and I know why my friends in Gaza are frightened today. Something tells me they won’t be sleeping so well tonight.

I have a feeling that the grieving relatives of the dead five people will have a bad night too, albeit for different reasons. Let’s pray for them all.

“If I got the chance…”

“If I got the chance, I would kill him.”

Mahameed spoke quite matter-of-factly. We were sitting on a small wall, enjoying a lovely view of the big wall. Twilight was descending, and the sun’s dying rays lingered on the watchtower to our left. Looking out from its window, facing us, was a soldier.

“He’s about your age,” I said quietly.

“That doesn’t matter to them. Sometimes they come into camp and take boys who are eleven, twelve. They arrest them in the night. They do not care about the age.”

Mahameed is a seventeen-year-old boy living in a refugee camp near Hebron. I looked at him with a kind of awkward sympathy. Life in the camp provides a thorough education in occupation’s brutality; he experiences from the inside the things I witness from the outside, but can never fully know. I am cushioned from the reality by my passport and my plane ticket. If I wanted to, I could be out of here tomorrow. If I chose to, I could cut the queue at the machsom by using the passage marked ‘Tourist/Humanitarian Lane’, bypassing the tightly packed crowd of Palestinians who have been wedged behind bars for hours. I have only ever done that once (and won’t ever do it again – Palestinians reading this, please forgive me) but I know that the option is there. Because I’m not Palestinian. I might be living under occupation, but I’m not occupied. And so I feel uneasy when I meet Palestinians who advocate violence against the army, because how can I tell them about how they can and can’t resist?

I wasn’t a pacifist before I came here. My gradual rejection of the idea of a just war came through the influence of my Palestinian colleagues at the centre, for whom non-violence is more of a way of life than a political strategy. During one women’s group meeting that I attended, we talked about a quotation from Martin Luther King: “It is no longer a choice between violence and non-violence. The choice is between non-violence and non-existence.” I sat silently and listened as women who were to become close friends described how they saw violence as a corrosive that eats away at their dignity. Eventually one woman burst out, “But how do we take this to our neighbours, the people who do believe in violence as resistance, who voted Hamas?” One of the suggestions that the other women gave was just to listen.

“I didn’t mean to suggest that he’s innocent,” I said to Mahameed, my gaze returning to the watchtower. “I was just wondering if you see him as anything like you. After all, if you had been brought up in Israel as a Jewish kid, you would be due to start your military service next year.”

“No,” Mahameed spoke definitely. “I wouldn’t go.”

“Can you be sure about that? If you had never seen your camp, if you had been raised in some Israeli town…”

He smiled slightly. “I still wouldn’t go. I am sure.”

I waited for him to continue. He was quiet for a few seconds. Then, “There are people in Israel who do not go to the army.”

“Yes.”

“They are good. I know about them even though I’ve never seen them.  If I lived in Israel I would hear about them, yes? So I would be one of them too. I would not go.”

It’s not that easy, I wanted to say, but I stopped myself. I am in no position to be telling him what’s easy and what isn’t.

Mahameed continued, “They come to our school and sit in the playground, to provoke us. They want the boys to come out and throw stones, then they can shoot the tear gas. Sometimes they shoot it into the school through the windows. The teachers try to keep us in the classroom even when there is gas. They don’t want trouble. But as soon as we see the soldiers on the football ground, we chase them.”

I had a sudden memory of what a soldier in Hebron once told me. “We’re so fucking bored. It’s pointless being here.” I asked Mahameed, “Why do you think they act like that?”

Mahameed shrugged. “They like to harm us and to confuse us. They come to the camp and play football with the small children. On another day they go to the school with tear gas. They try to look good, but inside they aren’t.”

“Some of them have told me that they get very bored and stressed in Hebron. Do you think it could just be that they’re looking for something to do?”

Mahameed looked blank, so I repeated the question in Arabic. He stared down at his feet for a long time. He seemed to be considering it, and I did not want to rush him. We sat silently on the wall. It was growing dark; the soldier’s face was no longer visible. Now we could only see his shadow.

Several minutes later, “Supposing you could kill that guy in the tower, why would you do it? What good would it do?”

“It would make the soldiers afraid from us,” he said.

“Mahameed, I think they’re already afraid of you.”

“Yes. I know. Sometimes in camp, if there are just a few of them and many of us, they run away. They don’t like it. We need to get them away. When they are afraid, they leave us alone.”

“Is that what you want the most from them? To leave you alone?”

“Yes.”

“Do they frighten you?”

“No,” vehemently. “They can’t make me be like that. Listen to me. You must never be afraid from them. If they get you afraid, they will make you into a spier for them. You have to be brave, to keep looking at them straight in their faces, then they will know that they can’t get you. Even if they put you in the prison, they can’t get you. Then they leave you alone.”

“You wouldn’t want to kill that dude if he was leaving you alone instead of standing there staring at us?”

Mahameed looked at me, laughed slightly, and held out his hand. “I promise you I won’t hurt the soldiers.”

We shook on that. “No stones?” I asked, mock-severely. He grinned. “Just small ones.”

I wanted to know his opinion on Israelis who aren’t currently in the army. I did not expect it to be favourable, as pretty much everyone has served in the military at some point. My expectation must have been apparent to Mahameed, because he said emphatically, “No, it is just the soldiers I hate. The others are OK. We can be friends with them. I have ten or twelve Israeli friends.”

“But most people serve,” I pointed out.

“They are OK,” Mahameed repeated. I was beginning to notice that he had a tendency to compartmentalise people: to him soldiers are a species all of their own. Once an Israeli hangs up military uniform, the years he or she spent in that uniform vanish; the ex-soldier becomes just another person. I have witnessed this tendency in many people here. The process of splitting is the only way to make sense of somebody who is playing football with your little brother one minute and tear-gassing you the next. It’s also a bulwark against hatred, albeit a malformed one. Mahameed is angry, and with good reason; but in his own way he is trying not to let the anger become indiscriminate.

“There is an Israeli woman living near us,” he told me. “She is married to a Palestinian man. She has two sons. She wants them to be in the IDF.”

“What?!”

“I do not know why,” he said, looking as perplexed as I felt. This must have shaken up his mental filing system. It had certainly shaken up mine. No doubt attempting to restore some kind of order to his brain, he added, “She is a Muslim woman, but maybe she is only saying this and really she is bad.”

Privately I suspected that it wasn’t as simple as that, but I let it be. “Your friends in Israel, are they your age?” I asked him.

“Mostly. Some are younger by one or two years.”

“Will they be in the army?”

“Yes. I tell them to be kind.”

“You don’t tell them to refuse?”

“No. I think they should go the army but be kind.”

This didn’t seem to fit with what he had been saying earlier. I pressed him on this, but I don’t think he understood what I was asking. He just kept repeating, “They need to act kindly.”

“How did you meet them?” I asked curiously. “Did they come to Hebron?”

“No, they are never in Hebron.” He laughed at the thought.

“Oh, so you had a permit to go to Jerusalem?”

Mahameed grinned. “No permit. I climb over the fence. You can sneak past the soldiers. Sometimes we even climb the wall. I met my friends with the Facebook. It’s good for that. I tell them, when they are in the army, keep away from the camp. But after, if they ever come back, we can play football.”

A work in progress

It begins four years ago, with this article on Harry Patch, the last Tommy, a survivor of Passchendaele.

A few years ago he was taken to meet a German veteran who had fought opposite him in Flanders. “Nice old chap. A pacifist. Same as me. Why did they suffer, those millions of men?”

He’s a pacifist?

Well, yes, and I can see why. It’s an impractical worldview. It could never work. But after everything he’s experienced, I understand why he thinks like that.

What does it feel like to be the last of those millions, that army of ghosts?

“I don’t like it,” he says and then adds: “I sit there and think. And some nights I dream – of that first battle. I can’t forget it.

“I fell in a trench. There was a fella there. He must have been about our age. He was ripped shoulder to waist with shrapnel. I held his hand for the last 60 seconds of his life. He only said one word: ‘Mother’. I didn’t see her, but she was there.”

So you think his pacifism is a weakness? Something he came to believe in as a response to trauma? Something a strong right-thinking person could never accept?

He has to cope with the past somehow.

Read what he’s saying again. This is not just about his past, but our future. He doesn’t want anybody else to die that way.

Vicky, don’t be naive. War is ugly, but sometimes it’s necessary.

You say it’s ugly and necessary, and you’ve never seen it. He’s saying it’s both ugly and unnecessary, and he’s seen it. Who am I to believe?

Well, how would you have responded to Hitler? Sometimes you have to fight to save lives.

Really? Couldn’t it have been done in another way? If thousands of people armed with bread-baskets had gone into the Weimar Republic, maybe there wouldn’t have been any need to send in thousands of people with guns.

That’s wishful thinking. You have to be realistic.

Severe hardship is often a crucible for extremist ideologies. That seems like a realistic observation to me. And what’s so wishful about trying to alleviate the hardships before extremism raises up its head? Is it any harder to bake bread than it is to build bomber planes? Does it cost more?

Forget that for a minute -

- Don’t tell me to forget, don’t avoid my questions -

- Stop interrupting! Just tell me what you’d do when the danger has already arrived, when there are people out there who are ready to slaughter other people. Do you mean to say that you’d just let them get on with it?

Of course not.

So how do you deal with them, Ms Idealist?

I – I don’t know.

Three years ago

The following are foreign observer operations with offices in Hebron. They have volunteer programmes; check the websites for more details.
1.) Christian Peacemaker Teams (http:///www.cpt.org). Their motto, ‘Getting in the Way’, is a wry nod to their work in the city…

- Lonely Planet Guidebook: Israel and the Palestinian Territories

What’s all this about? Let’s go and look.

We’ve heard of CPT before. Norman Kember, remember? He was captured by insurgents in Iraq, and when he was rescued by the coalition forces, he refused to give them any information that could harm his captors.

Listen to what they’re asking here: “What would happen if Christians devoted the same discipline and self-sacrifice to nonviolet peacemaking that armies devote to war?”

You’ve seen what happens. Norman Kember got captured. He could have died. It’s just not safe.

Could have, might have. This way of speaking is full of fear. All sorts of things could have happened; all kinds of things might happen. Nobody can predict what might happen to her in the future. I can’t control that. But I can control how I act now. Maybe this makes me even more powerful than an army – after all, they don’t make their own choices, they have to obey.

Would you choose to die? Pretty futile choice if you ask me.

Well, isn’t that what you’re advocating with your defence of war? Soldiers and civilians die because of war all the time. Why is it an ugly necessity to die in a fight, but futile to give your life in the cause of peace?

It’s impossible to halt a conflict nonviolently. Look, you’ve seen what the Israeli military is capable of. Houses flattened, doctors having to operate without anaesthetic because of the blockades, cluster bombs clawing into skin. Do you honestly think it is possible to stop that machine without force?

Yes. My most powerful weapons are my own voice and my own body. I don’t need a gun.

Rachel Corrie could have said the same, and look what happened to her.

She was one woman in front of a bulldozer. Can you imagine what would have happened if there had been five hundred such women? Five thousand?

But there weren’t….

Well, today there is one more such woman.

Two years ago

Listen to them talking. They’re saying that they don’t want to kill civilians. That they had no choice, they need to root out Hamas, there will always be some collateral damage in a war like this. What’s our answer going to be?

I don’t want to give them an answer. I want to ask questions. The humanitarian organisations are saying that around three civilians died for every combatant. What does this mean? Does it mean that one combatant death is worth more than three civilian lives? And if the purpose of Cast Lead was to save lives, as is being claimed, surely something has gone horribly wrong somewhere.

The answer is yes. You know it. They think it’s worth it. Just listen to what that lady from Sderot said just before it happened: “I hope that Israel does go into Gaza – even if citizens there get hurt. Because here in Sderot we are getting hurt.”

And advocating killing and violence is supposed to change her mind? Don’t you think she’s already had enough of that? This whole peace thing – it’s not just about stopping people from dying. It should be about helping those who trust in violence to change their lives, because really, what sort of life have you got if you believe its maintenance is contingent on killing others? People have believed this for millennia, and what has it ever done except caused pain?

I think you might be on to something. Suppose I trust you for all of two seconds. What do you suggest we do?

Give me a minute to think.

One year ago

Dear Vicky,

The short answer to your query is: yes. You would be very welcome to volunteer with us…Our groups would help you to immerse yourself in Palestinian society. You could be involved in different projects…

We have to do something practical, you see, because pacifism is not how I thought. I used to think that being pacifist meant being passive. A doormat. Letting people walk all over you. But -

- You do have to let them do that.

Wait, I thought we were in agreement now?

Yes. We are. But you do have to let people walk all over you. Not as a doormat, but as a bridge. Maybe that’s what it all means, after all. Giving yourself for others.

I’m not there yet.

No. Not yet.